The Article 88 in Football Association Malaysia (FAM) has been a hot issue lately. According to this article, only the president of FAM and the secretary have the right to openly criticize the FAM organisation. For this reason, a few high-profile sports personalities were punished under Article 88 including former national coach B Sathianathan, FAM deputy president Tan Sri Annuar Musa,
Perlis FA president Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim and the latest, Johor FA
president Tunku Mahkota Johor Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim.
Recently, the national coach, Datuk K. Rajagobal voiced his concern over the lack of local strikers in the M-League. Rajagobal was said to have done this following the national side’s 4-1 drubbing by Saudi Arabia in a friendly match on March 17. As a national coach, he deserves to voice out his opinion regarding the national team's performance. If the team's performance is not good, then the first person to be blamed is the coach himself. So, he has every right to concern about his job.
Besides, if the quality of the Malaysian league is good enough, then why did the Young Tiger A squad was sent to Slovakian league? This issue has raised a big question to all football fans. Perhaps, we should focus more on improving the quality of the league rather than focusing on the Article 88 itself. I do agree that the article should be maintained or otherwise many people will condemn FAM freely, but I believe that it is not yet perfect.
According to the Youth and Sports Minister, Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek, the article should be revised if it is contradicted to the The Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). Who's bigger between FIFA and FAM? I personally hope that some changes will be done to improve the national side of football. What's the point of having a perfect football organisation if the football squad itself fall to 164 rank in FIFA's national squad ranking?